|
Make good use of the two sacraments, whereof one brings
cleansing,
and the other life
We all know that, after baptism which regenerates but can only be
supplied once, the two chief springs of grace are the sacraments
of Penance and the Holy Eucharist, which may be renewed as often
as the soul stands in need of them. The former cleanses it from
sin and renders it pure in God's sight; the latter maintains its
spiritual life by uniting it with the very Author of that life.
Therefore the right use of these two sacraments greatly tends to
sanctification, and his salvation is assured who does his best to
receive them worthily, and profit by them fully.
It would lead me too far were I to treat of this matter at length,
and my subject does not require it of me. I am not now writing for
those who only go to confession and communion in order to obey the
precept of the Church. This I will say, in case my book falls into
their hands. As long as they do only so much as is absolutely of
obligation, they run a great risk of not being rightly disposed
for the reception of these sacraments. If they have any bad
habits, it is most unlikely that they will overcome them, so long
as they go to confession and receive communion only once a year,
and their salvation, to say the least of it, will be imperilled.
Nor am I writing for those who are accustomed to confess and
communicate only on the great festivals. It may well be that their
lives will be exempt from grave sins, but they are surely wanting
in zeal for their sanctification, and respond neither to the
desires of the Church nor to Our Lord's intention in instituting
these two sacraments. I would advise them to consult some good
book on the advantages of frequent confession and communion; to
obey the pressing invitation of the Church, and to listen humbly
to the advice of their confessor.
I write only for those who, being resolved to lead a holy life
and, knowing that frequent participation in the sacraments is one
of the most effectual means to sanctification, have formed the
good habit of going to confession and communion weekly and even
oftener, as their occupations permit and their confessor
recommends. I write also for those who have given themselves to
God, such as priests and religious, who by their rule of life are
encouraged to frequent confession and communion.
In addressing, therefore, such persons I must confine myself only
to what is absolutely essential, if I am not to make this work too
long. In any case, the general rules in regard to frequent
confession and communion are sufficiently well known.
Now in the ancient Church, confession was much rarer, communion
much more frequent. The bishop was then the only, or almost the
only, confessor; and if the early Christians, who communicated
whenever they assisted at the Holy Sacrifice (not to mention the
times they communicated in their own homes), had gone to
confession as often as devout folk do now, the bishop, it is
obvious, would have had no time to hear them. As holy as their
lives were, nevertheless some small faults escaped them daily,
which they did not deem necessary to confess. If they had aught
against their brethren, they sought reconciliation before offering
their gifts; [31] and as for venial sins, they believed, as St.
Augustine teaches, that these were wholly remitted by the
recitation of the Lord's Prayer. They only applied to the bishop
or to someone deputed by him, for sins of some little magnitude or
concerning which they were in doubt; and we may well believe that
their consciences were at least as delicate as those of devout
persons of the present day.
As time wore on, and the number of confessors increased, the
facility with which one could apply to them made confession much
more frequent, whilst the holy custom of communicating whenever
present at Mass being lost, the idea began to take root that it
was necessary to receive the advice or permission of the confessor
before going to communion, and this led to much more frequent and
regular confessions; so much so, that people began to think that
they had to go to confession always before communicating.
Now such continual confessions, when made a matter of routine or
obligation, are subject to abuse. They give rise to anxiety and
scruples. The penitent worries himself to find something to say.
He dwells upon thoughts that had better be despised, and exposes
himself to be wanting in contrition. Often there is no matter for
absolution, and yet it would be distressing if the confessor gave
none. The worst of it is that, without confession, such persons
will not go to communion, when they could and should do. No one
knows what it costs sensible confessors to bring such souls to
reasonable practice in this matter. They take fright and are
scandalized. Very often, nothing can be done with them, and the
confessor is obliged to yield to their contumacy.
Another abuse, still greater and more common, is that of believing
that all perfection consists in the frequent participation of the
sacraments. Many think themselves saints because they communicate
weekly or daily, who yet never dream of correcting their faults;
who perhaps do not even know them, so blinded are they by self-
love. They are impatient, harsh, censorious, full of self-esteem
and contempt of their neighbour, proud of the multitude of their
external observances, and without the slightest idea of interior
mortification. All the profit they derive from their communions
and other pious exercises consists in spiritual vanity, secret
pride, and all the subtle vices engendered by devotion grafted on
to self-love.
A third abuse is that of treating confession and communion as
matters of routine. Those who fall into this error come to the
sacraments without any, or with only superficial, examination of
conscience. It may be that they are afraid of breaking their rule
and of attracting attention; or their director may have given them
certain orders. And so these most holy actions are performed as
perfunctorily as if they were the most ordinary affairs.
Let us consider each sacrament separately. The thing most to be
feared in the matter of frequent confession is that, either the
examination of conscience is insufficient, or else it is
exaggerated and scrupulous. Persons of a light or thoughtless
nature, or whose devotion is cold and indifferent, are liable to
the first fault. Some only consider their external acts, and
scarcely give a thought to what passes within them. Others have
their pet sins, of which they seem quite unconscious, or they go
through a regular form of examination which they repeat by heart
to the confessor, nearly always in the same order and in the same
words. There are others also who, being habitually subject to
venial sins, such as breaking certain rules, and with no idea of
correcting themselves, presume to leave them out of their
examination and confession altogether. In general, their
examination is badly done, either from ignorance or for want of
watchfulness in the intervals between their confessions, or
because they are not sincere in their desire for perfection.
On the other hand, very timid souls, who have lively imaginations
or are narrow-minded, are apt to examine themselves too severely
or too anxiously. They see faults in everything, and these faults,
which are often nothing at all, they exaggerate and turn into
immense affairs. They confuse thought with consent, first
involuntary movements with determined acts . They worry themselves
looking for trouble, and hours are not sufficient for them when it
comes to their examination, and they go through torments every
time they go to confession. Their examination not only wearies
them at the time of confession, but all day long. They are
perpetually searching their conscience, and do nothing but fret
and dissect themselves.
I admit that it is not easy to keep to the happy medium. For those
who lead a regular life, with little contact with the outside
world, whose occupations vary little, and who are in the habit of
making their examination of conscience daily, I would say that the
immediate preparation before confession should not take long: a
glance should be sufficient to remind them of what they have done
during the week. Persons otherwise circumstanced require more
time, but such time has its limits. A quarter of an hour more than
suffices for a weekly confession, and it is better to run the risk
of forgetting some slight fault than to torture oneself in order
to omit none.
The examination should be made simply, quietly and honestly, after
having asked the Holy Ghost for that light on which you ought to
rely rather than on your own research. Instead of making painful
efforts to recall everything, beg the Holy Spirit to show you
those faults which most displease God, which offend your
neighbour, and hinder your own progress. Then think of those only
which come to your mind. Pay more attention to habitual than to
occasional faults, to those which are in any way deliberate than
to such as are simply inadvertent.
But it is much more important to feel real contrition for sin, and
to make an earnest resolution of amendment. Such souls as I have
here in mind do not find this difficult as regards great sins,
which I would imagine they hold in habitual abhorrence. But that
is not the case with regard to lesser sins of omission or
commission connected with propensities which they treat rather
lightly, and against which they have not the courage to fight
resolutely. Such are sins of vanity, curiosity, laziness, self-
indulgence, censoriousness and so forth. Such sins are always
cropping up, and it is not easy to conceive real sorrow for them,
or to make up one's mind never to commit them again, so long as
the root is left unattacked. What happens is that the branches are
lopped off, but they grow again at once, because the root is
spared. Contrition for venial faults, habitually and deliberately
committed, is as suspect as that for mortal sins of the same
nature. We would like to amend, but deep down our will is not so
sure. Grace demands correction, but nature refuses.
It is true that we can only hope for moral certainty of our
contrition, but if there is any way of quieting our minds on this
point it is by forming an earnest resolution never to commit a
fault deliberately and intentionally, and to keep to that
resolution. Then nothing remains but faults of impulse, of
inadvertence or simple frailty, to which the will only half
consents. A firm resolution never to sin wilfully readily obtains
from God the grace of sorrow for those sins into which we fall.
For the work of repentance is not our own but the gift of God; and
He only promises it to those who make good use of His other
graces.
Doubt, then, O Christian soul, of the sincerity of your
contrition until you have fully made up your mind to avoid every
deliberate sin; but once this is your habitual disposition, then
have no further uneasiness in the matter. You must not judge your
contrition by the feelings that you endeavour to excite at the
time of confession, nor by the acts you then make, but by your
habitual hatred of sin, your degree of watchfulness against it,
and your efforts to overcome evil propensities and habits. There
is no rule but this, and this rule is safe.
You are alarmed sometimes, because you feel no sorrow for sin, and
your heart seems frozen; your act of contrition appears to be a
mere formal set of words. You used to feel really grieved; love
constrained your heart, and you were even moved to tears. Look
well within yourself. See if you do truly detest the sins you are
going to confess. If so, be at ease, and seek no further
assurance. Your state of mind is probably better than when you
were touched with sensible grief. Do not hesitate, therefore, to
cast aside all fears and doubts and scruples on this subject: and,
having taken the advice of your confessor, if necessary, then
dismiss the matter entirely from your mind.
Besides, we do not excite contrition, as some suppose, by
squeezing feelings out of our hearts, or moving ourselves to
tears, but by humbly asking God to inspire our souls with true
repentance, and then simply and quietly making our act of
contrition. It is enough to do so once before confession,
repeating it while the priest is giving the absolution. Then as
regards the accusation. This is very often defective. We either
say too much, or too little, by reason of self-love or shame. Any
defects which result from ignorance or natural stupidity, will be
remedied by the confessor asking such questions as he deems fit.
The accusation should be short and simple. No useless details,
which often implicate other people; no circumlocution. If you have
to say that you were impatient, or wanting in charity, do not make
a long story of it. Some people think they would make a bad
confession, if they did not repeat exactly all that was said to
them, and all that they said in reply.
It must be clear and precise. No indistinctness, ambiguity, or
disguise. Let the confessor understand the thing as you do
yourself. None of those vague accusations, which merely take up
time, and to which those are prone who like to make long
confessions. You accuse yourself of self-love and pride. But these
are vicious habits; they are not sins. Of slackness in God's
service: the exact way in which you are slack should be mentioned.
You make lukewarm communions: what does that mean?
It must be thorough. No essential details should be suppressed.
Together with the fault, mention the motive which induced it, and
which is sometimes more sinful than the act itself. Be absolutely
sincere. If any fault is particularly humiliating, or if you fear
reproof for it, do not leave it to the last: really humble souls
begin with these. It is good also to mention one's temptations,
and explain in what they consist, even if you have reason to
believe that you have not given way to them. Shame sometimes leads
us to conceal certain temptations. There is danger in this. It is
a device of the devil to render a fall easier, and it generally
succeeds.
Lastly, the accusation must be strictly true. Do not exaggerate,
diminish or excuse your faults. Call that certain which you
believe to be certain; doubtful what you consider doubtful.
Scrupulous persons and those who suffer from temptations are apt
to accuse themselves of having consented when they have not done
so. When the confessor knows his penitents well, he should be on
his guard and not take them always at their word; otherwise, he
may well drive them to despair. Others think they should say more
rather than less: they should, if possible, say neither more nor
less. Those who are possessed of a strong and lively imagination
should be on their guard against it in their confessions.
Early instruction on the subject of confession is exceedingly
important because, at a certain age, it is almost impossible to
correct the erroneous customs contracted by long habit.
Except in cases of violent temptation and serious trouble, souls
in the passive way examine themselves very quietly. They see the
state of their conscience very clearly. They are neither
scrupulous nor do they slur over anything, for God never fails to
show them the least fault they commit. They are not uneasy in the
matter of their contrition. They accuse themselves with childlike
simplicity and candour. Their confessions are usually short and to
the point. Unless obliged by rule, they only confess when they
feel the need. When they do so by rule, they state quite simply
that they have nothing on their minds, if that is the case. By
these signs it is easy to know whether persons are in this way, or
are disposed to enter it.
Some may ask whether it is advisable to make use of those
exercises for confession and communion, which are to be found in
most manuals of devotion. I consider them useful and even
necessary for those who seldom approach the sacraments. They are
suitable also for young people, who are trying to be good and find
great difficulty in collecting their thoughts. Acts, well
repeated, inspire devotion where it previously did not exist, and
in general recall the mind from wandering. But I think that those
who enjoy the blessing of frequent communion should acquire the
habit of dispensing with these aids. For one thing, familiarity
lessens their effect, and they are only striking when they are
new. An exercise grows wearisome when we know it by heart, and it
leaves us cold and dry. And so we go from one thing to another,
without finding any real satisfaction.
Another great objection is that, when we find ready made acts in
books, we make no effort to excite our hearts to make them ours,
but having borrowed the sentiments of the writers fancy that we
have expressed our own. And these feelings which are not our own
leave very little behind them. Those, on the other hand, which
come spontaneously from within us, with the help of grace, nourish
the soul and develop it, giving rise to profitable dispositions
and, by being frequently renewed, form a habit of interior
recollection.
And there can be no doubt that the expression of our own feelings
is much more pleasing to God, being the kind of prayer which comes
straight from the heart. What can all these methodical and
prearranged acts mean to God? The thoughts that really please Him
are those which He Himself breathes into the soul, not those that
we seek elsewhere. Provided they are not needed to make up for our
indigence or fix our attention, it is better to do without them
and leave the heart free to express itself to God in its own way.
Free and spontaneous acts are much more natural and alive, and
also more effective.
Therefore I would suggest that you try gradually to dispense with
books, both before and after communion. Let your preparation and
thanksgiving be made quietly, without any straining of the mind,
and with the help of God alone, Who is never so near to us as in
these holiest of acts. And while acknowledging the insufficiency
of your own attempts to receive Jesus worthily, and worthily to
thank Him for this inestimable benefit, I would wish you
trustfully to ask Him to dispose your heart aright, and then
firmly believe and fully expect Him to do so. Then remain quietly
recollected and interiorly silent, giving Him complete liberty
over your heart, both as to the preparation for His reception and
to His taking entire possession of it.
This divine method in which Christ would give us of His fulness,
and we would give Him our simplicity, humility, faith, love and
trust, is much better than our bustle and activity, and the
shakings we give our soul in order to produce a little sensible
fervour. And what an intimate peace it brings; what sweet
suspension of the powers of the soul; what loving expectation of
Our Lord's coming and of the unspeakable blessedness of His
presence. Our self-love is always wanting to have a finger in the
business, and so spoils everything. It seems to fear that God
cannot do as well as it can itself. Whenever self-love interferes,
therefore, God does little or nothing.
I allow that this method is only suitable for souls that have made
some progress. But there are pure, young hearts, and indeed
wonderful penitents, whom God Himself calls to it, attracting them
to an interior silence, and kindling in them a sweet, powerful
love at the time of communion. These souls need fear nothing. At
such times, let them leave aside not only books, but also their
own acts, and yield to God's own action. The confessor need have
no anxiety on this point.
It is true that sensible sweetness at communion lasts only a
certain time, but it is also true that it should not be sought or
clung to. Nor, when God withdraws it, should it be regretted.
There is much spiritual sensuality in this: it is loving Our Lord,
not for His own sake but for His consolations. When the privation
of these consolations is not the result of any fault of ours, our
communion is none the worse, although it may be devoid of comfort.
Its peace is imparted, whether it be felt or no, and our heart is
filled, however empty it may feel. Our state at communion
generally corresponds to our state in prayer; and the further we
advance in the mortification of self, the more are we weaned from
all sweetness. If the heavenly food is then less pleasing to our
taste, it is all the more strengthening. In its trials, it is
strength that the soul needs, not consolations; and this strength
is abundantly bestowed in those communions in which nothing seems
to be imparted.
A communion is not to be judged by its immediate but by its
subsequent effects. God soon leads strong and generous souls
beyond sweetness, in order that He may give them what is more
substantial. A communion is excellent when it results in a
generous determination to correct our faults, to deny ourselves,
to bear the internal and external crosses sent by God, and to give
Him, according to our present state, the proofs He seeks of our
love, faithfulness and abandonment. Communions which do not
produce this effect bear very little fruit. Natural sensibility,
the imagination (not to say the devil) may often have the chief
share in the pleasure then enjoyed, which only serves to lull vain
and timid souls into dangerous illusions.
Now as to frequent communion, the confessor should give his advice
with holy discretion. It is the present mind of the Church that
the practice of frequent and even daily communion should be
encouraged for all Christians who are in a state of grace, and are
led by a right and pious intention, namely by a sincere desire to
advance in the spiritual life, and not by any human motive such as
habit or vanity. As soon as a Christian sets himself diligently to
work out his own salvation, he should be exhorted to communicate
often, without waiting until he is entirely rid of his former
habits, or rather in order that he may get rid of them more
easily. And there may be reasons, such as occasions of strong
temptations or difficult duties, which render frequent communion
still more desirable.
Greater profit will, of course, accrue to those who are not
attached to any venial sins, but are resolved to commit no
intentional fault and to obey the will of God in all things; who,
moreover, devote themselves to inward mortification and mental
prayer, so far as their condition allows, in order to acquire
strength in the practice of virtue, bravely fighting themselves
and avoiding all that might in any way draw them away from their
interior recollection and union with God. As the spiritual life
has its normal rate of progress, it is always easy for an
experienced director to see whether a soul is advancing or not,
and he will advise the frequency of communion according to the
needs of the penitent.
As for priests, secular or regular, who daily offer the Holy
Sacrifice, they must never think any perfection too high for them.
On the contrary, the priesthood is of itself an engagement to what
is most perfect in the Christian life. This is all the more so,
when it is joined to the vows of religion. If one is obliged by
one's office to say Mass, one is obviously obliged to say it
worthily, and to draw from it all the spiritual fruits attached to
it. It seems to me that by reason of their state, the functions
they fulfil, and the example they should set, it is a law for
them, not only to equal but to surpass in sanctity other
Christians who live an interior life. But let each examine and
judge himself in this matter.
|