|
If, as St. Thomas [4] says, the miser has the desire
of riches in an infinite degree, what must we then
say of the spiritual desire of the will? The higher
knowledge rises, the higher also, the deeper also, is
our spiritual desire. And Christian faith tells us
that God alone, seen face to face, can satisfy this
immeasurable desire. Hence we may say, in a true
sense, that our will has a depth without measure.
Hence beatitude, that true happiness which man
desires naturally and inevitably, cannot be found in
any limited good, but only in God, seen at least in
natural fashion and loved efficaciously above all
things. St.
Thomas [5] demonstrates the beatitude of man from the
fact that he conceives that universal good cannot be
found either in riches or in honor or in glory or in
power or in any material, corporeal good, not even in
any finite subjective good of the soul, like virtue,
lastly in no limited good whatever. The saint's [6]
thesis rests on the very nature of our intelligence
and our will. When we try to find happiness in the
knowledge of a science or in a friendship however
noble, we are not slow in recognizing that we are
dealing with a limited good, such as made St.
Catherine of Siena express herself as follows: "If
you wish any friendship to endure, if you wish to
quench your thirst for a long time, you must always
refill your cup at the source of living water,
otherwise it cannot continue to reply to your
thirst."
It is impossible, in fact, for man to find true
happiness which he desires naturally in any limited
good, because his intelligence at once seizes on this
limit, and thus conceives a higher good, and thus his
will naturally desires that higher good.
Even if it were to be granted to us to see an angel,
to behold without medium his suprasensible and purely
spiritual beauty, we would indeed at first be amazed.
But our intelligence, knowing universal good, would
not be slow in telling us that even this great good
is a
finite good, and would find this finite good very
poor in comparison with good itself, without limits
and without any imperfection.
Even the simultaneous collection of all finite good
would not constitute goodness itself, no more than an
innumerable multitude of idiots can equal a man of
genius.
Following St. Gregory the Great, St. Thomas writes:
Temporal goods appear desirable when we do not have
them; but when we do have them, we see their poverty,
which cannot meet our desire and which therefore
produces disillusion, lassitude, and often
repugnance. In spiritual goods the inverse is true.
They do not seem desirable to those who do not have
them and who desire especially sensible good. But the
more we possess them the more we know their value and
the more we love them. [7] For the same reason,
material goods,
the same house, the same field, cannot belong
simultaneously and integrally to many persons.
Spiritual goods, on the contrary, one and the same
truth, one and the same virtue, can belong
simultaneously and completely to all. And the more
perfectly we possess these goods, the better we can
communicate them to others. [8] This is especially
true of the sovereign good.
Of necessity, then, there exists an infinite good
which alone is capable of answering our aspirations.
Otherwise the universal amplitude of our will would
be a psychological absurdity, a thing radically
unintelligible, without raison d'etre.
Had God created us in a state purely natural without
grace, our last end would have been to know Him
naturally, by the reflection of His perfection in
creatures, and to love Him efficaciously above all
But gratuitously God has called us to know Him in
supernatural fashion by the immediate vision of His
divine essence, to know Him as He knows himself, to
love Him as He loves Himself and this for all
eternity. There, above all, we will understand that
God, seen face to face, can fill the immense void of
our heart, that He alone is able to fill the depth of
our will.
In what sense, then, is this depth of soul without
measure? One may object: Our soul like every creature
is finite and limited. Hence the soul-faculties are
also limited. Without doubt, the creature, even the
most elevated, is finite. Not only is our body
limited, but our soul also. Consequently the
faculties of our soul, as being characteristics of
the soul, are finite. Nevertheless our intelligence,
however finite, is created to know the universal
truth, even the infinite truth, which is God.
Similarly our will, although finite, is made to love
a good that has no limits. Without doubt, even in
heaven, our act of the beatific
vision, considered from the side of the subject which
knows, will be finite, but it is addressed to an
infinite object. It attains that object, though it
attains that object in a finite manner. It does not
comprehend God, but it understands Him, it sees Him
without medium, sees His infinite essence, His
infinite perfection. Thus, to illustrate, the open
eye, however small it may be, sees the immensity of
the ocean, sees into the night, even as far as the
stars, though they are millions of leagues away.
Thus, in heaven also, our act of seeing the divine
essence, though it has not the penetration of the
uncreated vision, attains immediately the divine
essence. Our love of God, though it remains finite
subjectively considered, rests immediately on the
infinite good, which we love indeed in our own finite
manner, but which makes it impossible for us to rest
except in Him. No other object can satisfy all our
aspirations. Then alone, says the Psalmist, [9] I
shall be satisfied when Thy glory shall appear. Our
heart can never find a durable rest except in the
love of God.
In this sense, seen from the objective side, our will
has an infinite depth. Our will is indeed finite as
being, just as our intelligence, but it opens upon
the infinite. As the Thomists express themselves: Our
faculties are infinite intentionally, from the side
of the object, i.e., our superior faculties are
finite in their entity, as characteristics of the
soul, but they have an object which is without limit.
Thus even in the sensible order our eye, however
small, reaches out to grasp the nebulae in the
immensity of the firmament. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Ia IIae, q 30, a. 4. |
| 5. |
2 Ibid., q. 2, a. 8. |
| 6. |
The beatitude of man cannot be
found in any created good, for beatitude is a perfect good,
something that totally satisfies the appetite. Otherwise it
would not be the last end and there would still be something
to desire. Now the object of the will, which is the human
appetite, is universal good, just as the object of the
intellect is universal truth. Hence it is clear that nothing
can satisfy the will of man except universal good. Now this
universal good cannot be found in anything created, but only
in God, because creatures have nothing but a share in
goodness. Therefore God alone can fill the will of man. Ia
IIae, q.2, a. 8. |
| 7. |
7 Ia IIae, q.31, a.5; q.32, a.2;
q.33, a.2. |
| 8. |
8 Ia IIae, q. 28, a.4 ad 2; IIIa,
q. 23, a. I ad 3. |
| 9. |
9 Ps. 16:15 |
|